NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission

Name

Capella university

NURS-FPX 6614 Structure and Process in Care Coordination

Prof. Name

Date

Enhancing COPD Care Coordination through Evidence-Based Practice

Greetings. I am ________. In this scholarly video presentation, I aim to explore the improvement of care coordination for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) through the lens of evidence-based practices. By addressing the clinical priorities defined by a structured PICOT question, the discussion centers on the implementation of a centralized Electronic Health Record (EHR) system in local healthcare settings. This intervention is compared to traditional paper-based documentation and assessed for its potential to enhance care coordination and clinical outcomes for COPD patients (McClinton, 2022).

The PICOT question posed is: “Among adult patients diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (P) within local healthcare institutions, does the adoption of a centralized Electronic Health Record (EHR) system (I) as opposed to conventional paper-based recordkeeping (C) lead to enhanced care coordination (O) within a six-month timeframe (T)?” The answer to this question lies in how effectively the centralized EHR system facilitates real-time data sharing, minimizes information silos, and improves interdisciplinary collaboration. Such systems streamline care delivery, reduce duplication of services, and contribute to more consistent and efficient treatment strategies (Arnold et al., 2020).

Multiple studies affirm the value of this approach. For instance, research by Classen et al. (2020) and Mullins et al. (2020) substantiates the claim that EHR systems significantly improve clinical decision-making, reduce medication errors, and enable timely interventions. Furthermore, Lalova-Spinks et al. (2024) caution that while EHR systems offer substantial benefits, they must also uphold stringent data privacy protocols. Overall, scholarly literature supports that centralized digital records promote better integration across care teams, enhancing patient safety and clinical efficacy.

Implementation and Resource Adaptation for Interprofessional Collaboration

The transition to a centralized EHR system necessitates changes in practice concerning both services and resources for interprofessional teams. This digital infrastructure offers a real-time, comprehensive view of a patient’s medical history, allowing for improved synchronization among healthcare professionals. These systems are equipped with clinical decision support tools, embedded guidelines, and interactive modules that assist in personalizing patient care and enhancing coordination efforts (Dixon et al., 2020).

The services and resources offered by a centralized EHR system are detailed in the following table:

Service/Resource	Functionality	Impact on Care Coordination
Real-time patient data access	Instant updates to treatment plans, diagnostics, and progress notes	Ensures continuity and timeliness of care
Clinical decision support tools	Automated alerts for drug interactions and recommendations	Enhances patient safety and clinical efficiency
Shared communication platforms	Unified messaging between providers across disciplines	Encourages collaboration and reduces care delays
Evidence-based guidelines integration	Standardizes treatment protocols based on best practices	Minimizes variation and promotes consistency in COPD management
Medication management systems	Tracks prescriptions, dosages, and potential conflicts	Reduces adverse drug events and improves adherence

Studies by Classen et al. (2020) and Mullins et al. (2020) validate the operational success of these resources. The integration of such systems supports a culture of shared responsibility, streamlines workflow across departments, and reduces administrative inefficiencies. Moreover, the interoperability of EHR platforms fosters transparent communication, leading to improved decision-making and stronger accountability within healthcare teams.

Stakeholder Engagement and Forward Planning for Safe, Efficient Care

A critical element in successful care coordination is stakeholder engagement. This includes healthcare providers, patients, families, and administrative personnel. Building engagement starts with open communication. Regular interdisciplinary meetings, team briefings, and stakeholder forums create opportunities to align goals and expectations. Vachon et al. (2022) emphasize that transparency in communication fosters trust, enabling all parties to contribute meaningfully to care strategies.

Stakeholder engagement is further reinforced through continuous education and training. Workshops on EHR navigation, patient-centered care principles, and chronic disease management tools ensure that all team members remain informed and competent in delivering optimal care. Involving patients and families through shared decision-making, educational programs, and advisory councils creates a sense of ownership, encouraging adherence and trust (Madawala et al., 2022; Myrhøj et al., 2023).

Looking forward, the integration of advanced technologies like artificial intelligence and predictive analytics will support the evolution of resource management. These tools offer predictive capabilities that help allocate resources efficiently and anticipate patient needs. Staff development and patient education remain foundational to sustainable care coordination. Additionally, Lalova-Spinks et al. (2024) emphasize the necessity of robust cybersecurity frameworks to ensure that digital systems uphold the integrity and privacy of patient data.

To maintain a high standard of care coordination, healthcare institutions must also commit to continuous quality improvement (CQI). This includes auditing existing care pathways, benchmarking performance metrics, and refining clinical protocols in alignment with the latest research. As Classen et al. (2020) suggest, integrating quality indicators into EHR systems can help monitor and improve care delivery processes. Interdisciplinary collaboration, supported by digital communication tools and patient feedback loops, remains key to achieving lasting improvements in COPD care.

Conclusion

This scholarly exploration began with the formulation of a targeted PICOT question, leading to an investigation into how centralized EHR systems could enhance care coordination for patients with COPD. The discussion highlighted the importance of digital tools in improving interdisciplinary collaboration, standardizing care protocols, and optimizing resource allocation. Active stakeholder engagement and ongoing education emerged as vital strategies for effective implementation. Looking ahead, thoughtful integration of technology, quality monitoring, and patient-centered practices will shape the future of safe, efficient COPD care coordination.

References

Arnold, M. T., Dolezal, B. A., & Cooper, C. B. (2020). Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Highly effective but often overlooked. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 83(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2020.0064

Classen, D. C., Holmgren, A. J., Co, Z., Newmark, L. P., Seger, D., Danforth, M., & Bates, D. W. (2020). National trends in the safety performance of electronic health record systems from 2009 to 2018. JAMA Network Open, 3(5), e205547. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5547

Dixon, P., Hollingworth, W., Benger, J., Calvert, J., Chalder, M., King, A., MacNeill, S., Morton, K., Sanderson, E., & Purdy, S. (2020). Observational cost-effectiveness analysis using routine data: Admission and discharge care bundles for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PharmacoEconomics – Open.

NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission

Gaveikaite, V., Grundstrom, C., Wintergerst, E., Palm, E., & Cajander, Å. (2020). Interprofessional collaboration through electronic health records: A comparative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(5), 615–623.

Lalova-Spinks, T., Jansen, M., & Toccaceli, M. (2024). Balancing patient data access with privacy in digital health systems. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e45276. https://doi.org/10.2196/45276

Madawala, R. H., Jones, M. D., & Smith, R. (2022). Engaging families in chronic disease management: Best practices and case studies. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(3), 612–618.

McClinton, A. (2022). Developing PICOT questions to improve chronic disease care in primary settings. Nursing Practice Today, 12(1), 15–21.

Mullins, C. D., Palumbo, F. B., & Wiggins, B. S. (2020). Using health information technology to enhance care coordination for chronic illnesses. Health Services Research, 55(2), 344–351.

Myrhøj, A., Skaarup, A. M., & Lunde, L. (2023). Implementation science in chronic disease management: A training perspective. Implementation Science Communications, 4(1), 78.

Renoux, C., Langan, S. M., & Suissa, S. (2020). Stakeholder involvement in healthcare reform: Strategies for inclusion. BMJ Open, 10(9), e037965. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037965

Vachon, T., Hall, R., & Magwood, G. (2022). Promoting interprofessional collaboration through effective communication strategies. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 36(1), 42–48.

NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission

Wileman, V., Griffin, S. C., & Young, A. (2023). Overcoming stakeholder resistance in digital transformation of healthcare. Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries, 17(1), 1–10.