NURS FPX 6016 Assessment 3 Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initative Proposal

Name

Capella university

NURS-FPX 6016 Quality Improvement of Interprofessional Care

Prof. Name

Date

Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal

Hello everyone. My name is ________. Today, I will present a plan aimed at enhancing patient safety and optimizing care delivery, which are critical objectives in healthcare settings.

 Adverse events in healthcare, such as medication errors, pose noteworthy risks to patient (Alqenae et al., 2020). This proposal addresses the critical incident at Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH), where a medication error due to high nurse workloads led to severe consequences for a cancer patient named Edward. The initiative aims to analyze dashboard data to identify healthcare issues and propose quality improvement strategies. Key areas of focus include assessing the quality of data, evaluating current practices against national and state benchmarks, and implementing evidence-based interventions. The proposal outlines the necessity for interprofessional collaboration, advanced technology integration, and staff training to enhance patient safety, reduce adverse events, and improve overall care quality at NMH.

Analysis of Dashboard Data Related to Healthcare Issues

National-level and State-level Benchmarks

National benchmarks for healthcare quality and patient safety are provided by organizations such as the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Medicare, and the National Quality Forum (NQF). These benchmarks include metrics for medication administration errors, patient safety incidents, and nurse staffing ratios. For example, the AHRQ indicates that the average rate of medication administration errors in hospitals varies from 8% to 25% (MacDowell et al., 2021). Additionally, AHRQ recommends maintaining a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:5 in surgical and medical units to ensure quality care (Rich, 2020). At the state level, the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) gives data on healthcare quality indicators, including medication error rates and staffing levels. Illinois hospitals are expected to adhere to CMS guidelines and strive to meet or exceed national benchmarks (IDPH, 2024).

Identified Healthcare Issues

The analysis focuses on the incident involving Edward, a 47-year-old patient with advanced cancer at NMH. The adverse event occurred due to the administration of an incorrect dosage of morphine by Nurse Alisa, which led to severe respiratory depression and subsequent ICU admission. This incident highlights several critical issues:

• Medication Administration Errors: The morphine overdose was a result of a significant medication administration error. Nationally, medication errors contribute to numerous adverse events annually, with serious implications for patient safety (Isaacs et al., 2020).
• Nurse Staffing and Workload: Nurse Alisa was overburdened due to understaffing, leading to cognitive fatigue and subsequent error. This aligns with national concerns about nurse staffing ratios impacting care quality and patient safety (Isaacs et al., 2020).
• Protocol Adherence and Communication: The incident revealed lapses in medication double-checking protocols and communication among healthcare providers, which are essential for preventing such errors (Isaacs et al., 2020).

Table: Metrics Comparison

Metrics	Benchmark Data	NMH Data
Medication Administration Errors	8%-25% (AHRQ) (MacDowell et al., 2021) As minimum as possible (IDPH, 2024)	62.4 errors per 1,000 medication orders (Northwestern Medicine, 2024)
Nurse-to-Patient Ratios	1:5 (AHRQ) (Rich, 2020) 1: 4-5 (IDPH, 2024)	Higher ratio due to understaffing (Medicare.gov, 2024)
Adverse Drug Events	Variable, with a significant focus on high-risk drugs (CDC, 2024)	5 Adverse events in 2023 (Northwestern Medicine, 2024)

Quality of the Data Evaluation

Data Quality and Analysis

The data provided on medication administration errors, nurse staffing ratios, and adverse drug events at Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH) are essential for assessing healthcare quality and patient safety. The information shows that NMH has a high rate of medication administration errors, with 62.4 errors per 1,000 medication orders, significantly exceeding the national benchmark of 8%-25% (AHRQ) (MacDowell et al., 2021). Additionally, nurse-to-patient ratios at NMH are higher than the recommended 1:5 ratios (Rich, 2020), indicating understaffing and increased workload for nurses. The data on adverse drug events, with five events reported in 2023, highlights the need for improved medication safety protocols (Northwestern Medicine, 2024).

Relating Data to Benchmarks

Nationally, benchmarks for healthcare quality and patient safety are provided by organizations such as AHRQ, Medicare, and the National Quality Forum (NQF). For instance, the AHRQ recommends maintaining a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:5 in medical-surgical units to ensure quality care (Rich, 2020). At the state level, the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) provides data on healthcare quality indicators, including medication error rates and staffing levels. The high rate of medication errors, with 62.4 errors per 1,000 medication orders, and the suboptimal nurse-to-patient ratio, which is higher than the recommended 1:5, suggest that NMH is not meeting the recommended standards for patient care (Northwestern Medicine, 2024).

Illinois hospitals are expected to adhere to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines and strive to meet or exceed national benchmarks (IDPH, 2024). Comparing NMH’s data to national benchmarks reveals significant gaps in quality and safety. These discrepancies indicate areas where NMH can focus its quality improvement efforts. Addressing these gaps will require systematic changes and a commitment to adopting best practices.

Benchmarks set by local, state, and federal healthcare policies align with several quality improvement initiatives to address medication administration errors. Federally, the CMS requires hospitals to adhere to specific quality measures, including those related to medication safety. These measures often align with the benchmarks provided by the AHRQ, which recommends error rates between 8% and 25% and the adoption of advanced technologies like Bar-coded Medication Administration (BCMA) systems and Electronic Medication Administration Records (eMARs) (AHRQ, n.d.). At the state level, the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) mandates hospitals to report medication error rates and staffing levels, aiming to meet or exceed these national standards (IDPH, 2024).

Identifying Target Areas for Improvement

Based on the data analysis, the key areas for improvement at NMH include medication administration errors, nurse staffing and workload, and protocol adherence and communication. The high rate of medication errors, currently at 62.4 errors per 1,000 medication orders, indicates a need for implementing stricter protocols and double-checking systems to reduce errors (Northwestern Medicine, 2024). Addressing understaffing by hiring more nurses and optimizing shift schedules will help reduce cognitive fatigue and improve patient care. Enhancing communication among healthcare providers and ensuring adherence to established protocols is crucial for preventing adverse events and improving safety (Davis et al., 2022).

Proposed Quality Improvement Initiative

To address these issues, NMH should implement a comprehensive Quality Improvement (QI) initiative. This initiative should focus on enhanced training programs, improved staffing models, technology integration, and communication improvement. Conducting regular training sessions for nurses and healthcare providers on medication administration protocols and patient safety measures will ensure that staff are well-equipped to handle their responsibilities (Bersani et al., 2020). Increasing nurse staffing levels to achieve the recommended 1:5 nurse-to-patient ratios will help reduce workload and improve patient care. Utilizing electronic health records (EHR) can minimize human errors and enhance protocol adherence. Establishing clear communication channels and regular team meetings will ensure all healthcare providers are on the same page regarding patient care protocols (Davis et al., 2022).

Assessing Stability and Outcome Measures

The stability of processes and outcomes at NMH can be assessed by monitoring key performance indicators (KPIs) such as medication error rates, nurse-to-patient ratios, and adverse drug events over time. For example, NMH currently has 62.4 medication errors per 1,000 medication orders, significantly higher than the national benchmark of 8%-25% (AHRQ) (MacDowell et al., 2021). Nurse-to-patient ratios are also higher than the recommended 1:5 ratios (Rich, 2020), indicating understaffing issues. Predictable outcomes can be achieved by consistently applying QI initiatives and addressing any variations or performance failures promptly.  Outcome measures should include the reduction in medication errors, improved nurse staffing levels, and decreased adverse drug events.

For instance, NMH reported five adverse drug events in 2023, which is an area needing improvement (Northwestern Medicine, 2024). These metrics can be tracked through regular audits and feedback mechanisms, ensuring that any deviations from expected performance are quickly identified and corrected. Regular monitoring and adjustments based on these measures will ensure continuous improvement and alignment with national benchmarks (Gates et al., 2020). By implementing these strategies, NMH can achieve better outcomes and improve healthcare quality, ultimately leading to safer patient care.

Quality Improvement Initiative and Proposed Strategies 

To address the issue of medication administration errors at NMH, a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative is proposed, focusing on reducing these errors through enhanced protocols, training, and technology integration. This initiative aligns with benchmarks set by local, state, and federal healthcare policies, including those from the AHRQ and Medicare, which emphasize medication safety and adequate nurse staffing levels (Medicare.gov, 2024).

NMH currently implements some quality improvement initiatives, such as protocol adherence and nurse training programs. However, these initiatives have been insufficient in addressing the high rates of medication errors and inadequate nurse staffing levels. The lack of advanced technologies like BCMA systems and eMARs further contributes to these issues. Implementing these technologies can significantly reduce human error and improve patient safety.

Existing quality initiatives at NMH include periodic training sessions on medication safety and adherence to double-checking protocols. However, these initiatives have proven insufficient due to persistent medication errors and high nurse-to-patient ratios (Leapfrog, 2024). The proposed strategies are grounded in the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model, which focuses on iterative testing and continuous improvement. The proposed QI initiative targets these deficiencies by introducing more comprehensive and systematic approaches. The initiative will focus on improving the nurse-to-patient ratio, ensuring adherence to double-checking protocols, and integrating advanced technologies such as Electronic Medication Administration Records (eMARs) and Bar-coded Medication Administration (BCMA) systems (Pruitt et al., 2023).

Comparison with Other Facilities

The Cleveland Clinic and Mayo Clinic serve as exemplary models for implementing comprehensive medication safety programs. At the Cleveland Clinic, the use of BCMA systems and eMARs has significantly reduced medication errors. These technologies ensure accurate patient and medication identification and facilitate real-time documentation. Additionally, the Cleveland Clinic emphasizes continuous education and training for nurses on safe medication practices, which contributes to their lower error rates (Cleveland Clinic, 2023).

Similarly, the Mayo Clinic focuses on integrating technology with clinical workflows to minimize errors. They utilize advanced Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) that provide real-time alerts and reminders to healthcare providers about potential medication errors. Their robust monitoring and reporting systems help promptly identify and address errors, resulting in consistently low medication error rates compared to national averages (Mayo Clinic, 2021).

Government and Non-Government Body Indicators

The AHRQ and the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) provide crucial benchmarks and guidelines for medication administration safety. AHRQ recommends national benchmarks for medication administration errors, with error rates between 8% and 25% (MacDowell et al., 2021). They also advocate for the adoption of BCMA systems and eMARs, which have been shown to reduce medication errors by up to 50%. ISMP promotes the implementation of standardized medication administration protocols and the use of technology to enhance safety.

Their guidelines include double-checking high-risk medications and conducting root cause analyses of errors to prevent recurrence. Facilities adhering to ISMP recommendations typically report lower error rates and improved patient safety outcomes (ISMP, 2024).Target areas for improvement include medication administration processes and nurse staffing levels. Modifying these processes involves implementing rigorous double-checking protocols and real-time monitoring systems to detect and prevent errors. Evidence-based strategies to improve quality include adopting simulation-based training programs for nurses to enhance their skills in medication administration and stress management.

Additionally, integrating eMARs and BCMA systems can significantly reduce human error by automating and standardizing the medication administration process (Pruitt et al., 2023). Evaluating this QI initiative against present quality gauges from other amenities and government agencies highlights the potential for substantial improvement. For instance, the use of AI-powered Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) has shown a reduction in medication errors in cancer patients, demonstrating the effectiveness of technology in enhancing patient safety (Elhaddad & Hamam, 2024).

NURS FPX 6016 Assessment 3 Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initative Proposal

Meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose challenges such as resource limitations and resistance to change within the organization. However, aligning the QI initiative with existing quality improvement indicators from other facilities, government agencies, and non-government bodies will provide a comprehensive framework for addressing these challenges. By implementing these strategies, NMH can significantly improve medication administration safety, enhance nurse staffing levels, and ultimately provide better patient care outcomes.

Moreover, meeting prescribed benchmarks poses challenges, such as securing funding for advanced technologies and ensuring consistent adherence to new protocols by the interprofessional team. Overcoming these challenges requires a collaborative effort involving regular training, transparent communication, and a culture that prioritizes patient safety (Shiima et al., 2021). By addressing these areas, NMH can enhance its quality of care and reduce medication administration errors, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.

Knowledge Gaps and Uncertainties

Despite the comprehensive approach of the proposed QI initiative, knowledge gaps remain. These include a detailed understanding of the underlying causes of nurse fatigue and specific workload impacts, the exact effectiveness of simulation-based training over time, and the integration challenges of advanced technologies like eMARs and BCMA systems. Additionally, more data on the long-term outcomes of similar initiatives at other institutions would provide a clearer benchmark for success (Fuller et al., 2022). Addressing these gaps requires ongoing research, continuous monitoring, and adaptation of strategies to ensure the initiative’s effectiveness and sustainability.

Integrating Interprofessional Perspectives

Integrating interprofessional perspectives is crucial for the success of the proposed QI initiative at NMH to reduce adverse events like in cancer patient Edward. By involving nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and administrative staff, the initiative can address the multifaceted nature of medication administration errors. Each professional group brings unique insights and expertise, ensuring comprehensive solutions to improve patient care, financial-effectiveness, and work-life excellence.

Nurses who are on the frontline of patient care can provide valuable feedback on the practical challenges they face, such as high patient loads and stress, which contribute to errors. Their input is essential for designing realistic double-checking protocols and identifying effective stress management strategies. Involving nurses in decision-making processes can also enhance their commitment to implementing new protocols and technologies (Privitera, 2022).

Physicians and pharmacologists play a serious role in confirming accurate medication orders and dispensation. Collaborative efforts between these professionals and nurses can streamline communication and reduce the likelihood of errors. For instance, regular interdisciplinary meetings can be established to review medication administration practices, discuss potential improvements, and address any emerging issues promptly (Gupta et al., 2023). Additionally, pharmacists can take a more active role in medication reconciliation processes, further minimizing the risk of errors (Koprivnik et al., 2020).

NURS FPX 6016 Assessment 3 Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initative Proposal

Administrative staff, including hospital management, must support the initiative by addressing staffing issues and allocating resources for advanced technologies like eMARs and BCMA systems. Their involvement is crucial in securing funding, optimizing nurse-to-patient ratios, and ensuring the sustainability of the QI efforts. Moreover, it has a key role in producing a supportive work environment that prioritizes staff well-being, which is essential for improving work-life quality and reducing burnout (Pereira et al., 2024).

To lead quality improvements effectively, NMH must foster a culture of continuous learning and collaboration. Regular training sessions, incorporating simulation-based exercises, should be conducted to enhance the skills and confidence of nursing staff. Implementing real-time monitoring systems and conducting periodic audits can ensure adherence to protocols and identify areas for ongoing improvement. By integrating interprofessional perspectives and specifying clear actions, NMH can enhance patient safety, achieve cost-effectiveness through reduced error-related expenses, and improve the work-life quality of healthcare providers (Schutijser et al., 2020). This holistic approach will ultimately lead to better patient outcomes and a more resilient healthcare system.

Assumptions

Assumptions for the proposed QI initiative at NMH include the belief that interprofessional collaboration will effectively reduce adverse events related to medication administration errors. It is assumed that nurses, physicians, and pharmacists will actively participate and communicate openly to identify and address potential issues. Another assumption is that hospital management will provide adequate resources and support for implementing advanced technologies and training programs. Additionally, it is presumed that addressing staffing issues and enhancing work-life quality will lead to a significant decrease in error rates and improve overall patient safety and outcomes at NMH (Schutijser et al., 2020).

Effective Collaboration and Communication Strategies

Effective collaboration approaches are vital for encouraging quality enhancement of interprofessional care at NMH to reduce adverse events like in cancer patient Edward. One key strategy is the establishment of regular interdisciplinary meetings. These meetings, involving nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and administrative staff, create a platform for discussing medication administration practices, reviewing adverse events, and developing solutions collectively. Such collaborative discussions foster a culture of transparency and mutual support, encouraging all team members to voice their concerns and contribute to safety initiatives (Schmid et al., 2022).

Implementing joint training sessions is another effective strategy. Simulation-based exercises can be designed to mimic real-life scenarios involving medication errors, allowing different professionals to work together in a controlled environment. These sessions enhance the skills of the healthcare team, improve communication, and build trust among colleagues. By practicing together, staff members become more adept at recognizing potential errors and efficiently coordinating their responses to prevent adverse events (Arul et al., 2021).

Additionally, establishing a feedback loop is critical for continuous improvement. NMH can implement a system where staff members can tale near-misses and contrary events with no fear of retribution. This data can then be analyzed in interdisciplinary meetings to identify trends and develop preventive measures (Abuosi et al., 2022). Encouraging a non-punitive approach to error reporting helps create a learning environment where staff can collaborate to enhance patient safety. Lastly, administrative support is vital. Hospital leadership must be committed to maintaining appropriate nurse-to-patient ratios, providing resources for training and technology, and promoting a work culture that values interprofessional collaboration (Sabone et al., 2019). By prioritizing these strategies, NMH can improve the quality of interprofessional care, significantly reduce adverse events, and enhance overall patient safety and outcomes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the quality improvement initiative at NMH aims to reduce adverse events related to medication administration errors through enhanced interprofessional collaboration, advanced technology, and comprehensive training. By addressing staffing issues and implementing effective communication strategies, the initiative seeks to improve patient safety, care quality, and work-life balance for healthcare providers. Continuous feedback and a supportive leadership framework are essential to sustain these improvements. 

References

  Abuosi, A. A., Poku, C. A., Attafuah, P. Y. A., Anaba, E. A., Abor, P. A., Setordji, A., & Nketiah-Amponsah, E. (2022). Safety culture and adverse event reporting in Ghanaian healthcare facilities: Implications for patient safety. PLOS ONE, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275606

AHRQ. (n.d.). Bar-coded medication administration | digital healthcare research. Digital.ahrq.gov. https://digital.ahrq.gov/bar-coded-medication-administration

Alqenae, F. A., Steinke, D., & Keers, R. N. (2020). Prevalence and nature of medication errors and medication-related harm following discharge from hospital to community settings: A systematic review. Drug Safety, 43(6), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00918-3

Arul, N., Ahmad, I., Hamilton, J., Sey, R., Tillson, P., Hutson, S., Narang, R., Norgaard, J., Lee, H. C., Bergin, J., Quinn, J., Halamek, L. P., Yamada, N. K., Fuerch, J., & Chitkara, R. (2021). Lessons learned from a collaborative to develop a sustainable simulation-based training program in neonatal resuscitation: Simulating success. Children, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/children8010039

Bersani, K., Fuller, T. E., Garabedian, P., Espares, J., Mlaver, E., Businger, A., Chang, F., Boxer, R. B., Schnock, K. O., Rozenblum, R., Dykes, P. C., Dalal, A. K., Benneyan, J. C., Lehmann, L. S., Gershanik, E. F., Bates, D. W., & Schnipper, J. L. (2020). Use, perceived usability, and barriers to implementation of a patient safety dashboard integrated within a vendor EHR. Applied Clinical Informatics, 11(01), 034–045. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402756

NURS FPX 6016 Assessment 3 Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initative Proposal

CDC. (2024, May 3). FastStats: Medication safety data. Medication Safety Program. https://www.cdc.gov/medication-safety/data-research/facts-stats/index.html

Cleveland Clinic . (2023). Cleveland Clinic wins digital records kudos. Www.independent-Practitioner-Today.co.uk. https://www.independent-practitioner-today.co.uk/2023/10/cleveland-clinic-wins-digital-records-kudos/

Davis, B., Kendall, B. K., & Dumas, R. P. (2022). A review of COVID-19’s impact on modern medical systems from a health organization management perspective. Health and Technology, 12(4), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-022-00660-z

Elhaddad, M., & Hamam, S. (2024). AI-driven clinical decision support systems: An ongoing pursuit of potential. Cureus, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57728

Fuller, A. E. C., Guirguis, L. M., Sadowski, C. A., & Makowsky, M. J. (2022). Evaluation of medication incidents in a long-term care facility using electronic medication administration records and barcode technology. The Senior Care Pharmacist, 37(9), 421–447. https://doi.org/10.4140/tcp.n.2022.421

Gates, P. J., Hardie, R.-A., Raban, M. Z., Li, L., & Westbrook, J. I. (2020). How effective are electronic medication systems in reducing medication error rates and associated harm among hospital inpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(1), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa230

NURS FPX 6016 Assessment 3 Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initative Proposal

Gupta, Y., Kumar, N., Shukla, A., & Rai, V. (2023). Assessment of the role of pharmacists in preventing medication errors in hospital settings. Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 2(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.2.2.30

IDPH. (2024). Adverse health care events. Dph.illinois.gov. https://dph.illinois.gov/topics-services/prevention-wellness/patient-safety-quality/adverse-health-care-events.html

Isaacs, A. N., Ch’ng, K., Delhiwale, N., Taylor, K., Kent, B., & Raymond, A. (2020). Hospital medication errors: A cross sectional study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa136

ISMP. (2024). Targeted medication safety best practices for hospitals. ECRI and ISMP. https://home.ecri.org/blogs/ismp-resources/targeted-medication-safety-best-practices-for-hospitals

Koprivnik, S., Albiñana-Pérez, M. S., López-Sandomingo, L., Taboada-López, R. J., & Rodríguez-Penín, I. (2020). Improving patient safety through a pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programme in nursing homes for the elderly in Spain. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 42(2), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-00968-8

Leapfrog. (2024). Hospital details table. Www.hospitalsafetygrade.org. https://www.hospitalsafetygrade.org/table-details/northwestern-memorial-hospital

MacDowell, P., Cabri, A., & Davis, M. (2021). Medication administration errors. AHRQ.gov. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/medication-administration-errors

Mayo Clinic. (2021). Clinical decision support systems for personalized management of patients with acute kidney injury – Mayo Clinic. Www.mayoclinic.org. https://www.mayoclinic.org/medical-professionals/pulmonary-medicine/news/clinical-decision-support-systems-for-personalized-management-of-patients-with-acute-kidney-injury/mac-20524049

Medicare.gov. (2024, April 24). Find healthcare providers: Compare care near you. Www.medicare.gov. https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/details/hospital/140281/view-all?state=NY

Northwestern Medicine. (2024). Serious events. Northwestern Medicine. https://www.nm.org/about-us/quality/quality-measures/sites-of-care/northwestern-memorial-hospital/national-comparisons/leapfrog-group/serious-events

Pereira, N., Duff, J. P., Hayward, T., Kherani, T., Moniz, N., Champigny, C., Carson-Stevens, A., Bowie, P., & Egan, R. (2024). Methods for studying medication safety following electronic health record implementation in acute care: A scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 31(2), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad231

Privitera, M. R. (2022). Promoting clinician well-being and patient safety using human factors science: Reducing unnecessary occupational stress. Health, 14(12), 1334–1356. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2022.1412095

NURS FPX 6016 Assessment 3 Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initative Proposal

Pruitt, Z. M., Kazi, S., Weir, C., Taft, T., Busog, D.-N., Ratwani, R., & Hettinger, A. Z. (2023). A systematic review of quantitative methods for evaluating electronic medication administration record and bar-coded medication administration usability. Applied Clinical Informatics, 14(01), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761435

Rich, V. (2020, August). Nurse staffing ratios: The crucible of money, policy, research, and patient care. Ahrq.gov. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/web-mm/nurse-staffing-ratios-crucible-money-policy-research-and-patient-care

Sabone, M., Mazonde, P., Cainelli, F., Maitshoko, M., Joseph, R., Shayo, J., Morris, B., Muecke, M., Wall, B. M., Hoke, L., Peng, L., Mooney-Doyle, K., & Ulrich, C. M. (2019). Everyday ethical challenges of nurse-physician collaboration. Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019840753

Schmid, S., Schlosser, S., Gülow, K., Pavel, V., Müller, M., & Kratzer, A. (2022). Interprofessional collaboration between ICU physicians, staff nurses, and hospital pharmacists optimizes antimicrobial treatment and improves quality of care and economic outcome. Antibiotics, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030381

Schutijser, B. C. F. M., Klopotowska, J. E., Jongerden, I. P., Wagner, C., & de Bruijne, M. C. (2020). Feasibility of reusing routinely recorded data to monitor the safe preparation and administration of injectable medication: A multicenter cross-sectional study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104201

Shiima, Y., Malik, M., & Okorie, M. (2021). Medication without harm: Developing optimal medication error reporting systems. Current Drug Safety, 16. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574886316666210423115029