NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 1 Locating Credible Databases and Research

Name

Capella university

NURS-FPX 4030 Making Evidence-Based Decisions

Prof. Name

Date

Locating Credible Databases and Research

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is vital for improving patient care.  Healthcare professionals managing Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) require credible research for efficient management.  CKD is a chronic disorder that needs constant treatment.  This treatment involves dietary adjustments, blood pressure control, dialysis education, and medicine management.  CKD develops when kidney function fails.  It is indicated by a Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (Charles & Ferris, 2020).  Nurses must employ recent and reliable evidence to inform their clinical selections.  This assessment underlines how the databases contribute to quality research for CKD management and intervention approaches.

Communication and Collaboration Strategies

Regular huddles serve as a valuable method for nurses to address opportunities related to diagnosis research.  Huddles support productive communication and data exchange among team members.  These short and focused meetings empower groups to share evidence swiftly.  They also establish aims and define research priorities (Lin et al., 2022).  Huddles can identify particular subjects, especially regarding CKD.  They highlight key resources and research efforts associated directly with patient care outcomes.  Employing huddles expands professional growth by keeping nurses informed on research objectives.  They foster teamwork and shared accountability.  Another method includes inspiring healthcare staff through constant feedback and support during their research efforts.  A positive learning environment is essential for nurses’ growth. 

Efficient feedback practices inspire learners to attain their ambitions (Rapin et al., 2023).  This can be achieved through individual discussions, peer assessments, and informal check-ins.  It improves nurses’ understanding of CKD and helps them feel supported.  This strategy reinforces professional relations by identifying their contributions and supporting growth opportunities through positive feedback.  It improves their confidence and readiness to pursue more research.  Moreover, forming multidisciplinary research teams is dynamic and requires collaboration.  These teams nurture a collaborative learning environment (Wen et al., 2020). 

Effective collaboration allows nurses to learn from experts in kidney disease management.  Nurses can provide clinical insights and gain assistance from their colleagues.  This support includes retrieving resources, analyzing data, and incorporating research into clinical practice.  This approach recovers relationships among various healthcare experts.  It nurtures a sense of community and shared accountability.  It develops nurses’ research abilities through collaboration with experts in diverse disciplines.

Places to Complete Research within the Healthcare Environment

The nurse’s station is an outstanding location for conducting research in the healthcare setting.  It is a pivotal point where nurses can approach clinical computers, patient histories, and online resources (Kouame & Hendren, 2022).  Nurses can promptly find relevant data about CKD through medical databases such as PubMed or CINAHL.  Moreover, the nurse’s station is located within the patient care area.  It permits nurses to research while staying attentive to patient desires.  This setting nurtures collaboration and allows nurses to share knowledge and seek help from colleagues in real-time. 

Another valuable research location is the hospital library or resource center.  This place offers a quiet, focused environment perfect for systematic research.  Libraries often comprise physical resources.  They include medicinal textbooks and journals related to kidney health.  Nurses can also access several digital resources to collect important data on CKD management.  Furthermore, libraries have specialized resources and experienced librarians who can support in finding quality and reliable research materials (Hanell & Ahlryd, 2021).

Five Sources of Online Information for Research

Five sources deliver a strong foundation of evidence-based data for CKD care.  The sources are graded based on their relevance for nurses.  The top source is PubMed.  This huge database presents free access to biomedical literature.  It contains medical studies and systematic reviews.  For example, a study by Charles and Ferris (2020) was published in PubMed.  It addresses the development and management of CKD. 

This study proposes reliable and appropriate data for nurses to apply to patient care decisions.  The second resource is the Cochrane Library.  This library is recognized for its quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses on healthcare interventions.  A systematic review by Cashmore et al. (2024), from this library examines the efficiency of various CKD treatments.  It underlines strategies such as enhancing health literacy.  This makes it a vital resource for evidence-based practices.  The third source is the National Kidney Foundation (NKF).  The NKF offers evidence-based guidelines, educational materials, and updates on CKD research. 

Its Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) strategies proposal detailed guidance for managing CKD.  This source assists nurses in delivering current patient care (National Kidney Foundation, 2024).  The fourth resource is the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK).  This organization is a trustworthy source of educational materials, research updates, and evidence-based data for CKD treatment (NIDDK, n.d.).  Lastly, Kidney International is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nephrology.  It publishes articles and reviews about kidney diseases, including CKD.  A study by Li et al. (2020) covers screening, prevention, and management in CKD patients.  This journal is primarily appropriate for specialized nephrology research.

Justification and Criteria Used to Determine Relevance and Usefulness of Sources

The selected sources provide robust support for CKD management due to their reliability and relevance.  The CRAAP criteria help assess their efficiency.  Currency checks that the data is current and precise (Nakayama et al., 2022).  Each resource comprises the latest studies related to CKD care.  Relevance evaluates how well the content meets the requirements of nursing practice. 

All sources propose thorough CKD guidelines personalized for healthcare experts.  Authority studies the credibility of the authors involved.  For instance, databases like PubMed and the Cochrane Library are linked with distinguished experts in the field of nephrology.  Accuracy approves that the data presented is effective and that peer-reviewed articles deliver reliable outcomes.  Lastly, the purpose assesses the aims of the sources.  All the materials aim to support CKD management.  These sources confirm that they present impartial information for making informed patient care decisions.

The selected sources suggest convincing evidence for CKD due to their reliability, relevance, and quality content.  First, trustworthy databases like PubMed and the Cochrane Library deliver access to peer-reviewed studies and systematic reviews.  They are considered to be the highest benchmark in medical research.  These sources present results from systematic studies and are vital for making informed decisions about patient care.  Furthermore, the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) is a significant resource.  It provides evidence-based standards that incorporate the latest research and clinical practices. 

These guiding principles support regulating care for CKD patients.  They guarantee that nurses follow best practices that improve patient outcomes.  The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) provides useful educational materials and research updates that assist in developing patient care strategies for CKD.  NIDDK offers insights into the newest progress in CKD management.  Kidney International is a journal devoted to nephrology and publishes research articles and reviews on several kidney disorders.  It includes CKD and other kidney ailments.  This journal is critical in understanding current treatment options and advancements.

Conclusion

Credible databases and reliable research resources are indispensable for efficient CKD management.  They deliver nurses with up-to-date, evidence-based strategies to expand patient outcomes.  Access to authoritative sources like PubMed, the Cochrane Library, NKF, NIDDK, and Kidney International provides nurses with evidence-based data.  This foundation empowers them to make research-driven decisions for current CKD management.  These resources support best practices.  They promote collaborative learning and improve the quality of care for CKD patients.

References

Cashmore, B. A., Cooper, T. E., Evangelidis, N. M., Green, S. C., Lopez-Vargas, P., & Tunnicliffe, D. J. (2024).  Education programmes for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.  Cochrane Library, 2024(8).  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007374.pub3

Charles, C., & Ferris, A. H. (2020).  Chronic kidney disease.  Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 47(4).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2020.08.001

Hanell, F., & Ahlryd, S. (2021). Information work of hospital librarians: Making the invisible visible.  Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(1), 096100062110632.  https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211063202

Kouame, G., & Hendren, S. (2022). Library tools at the nurses’ station: exploring information-seeking behaviors and needs of nurses in a war veterans nursing home.  Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(2).  https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1357

NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 1 Locating Credible Databases and Research

Li, P. K.T., Garcia, G., Lui, S.F., Andreoli, S., Fung, W. W.-S., Hradsky, A., Kumaraswami, L., Liakopoulos, V., Rakhimova, Z., Saadi, G., Strani, L., Ulasi, I., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Li, P. K. T., Garcia, G., Andreoli, S., Zadeh, K., Kumaraswami, L., Liakopoulos, V., & Lui, S.F. (2020).  Kidney health for everyone everywhere—from prevention to detection and equitable access to care.  Kidney International, 97(2), 226–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2019.12.002

Lin, S. P., Chang, C.-W., Wu, C.-Y., Chin, C.-S., Lin, C.-H., Shiu, S.-I., Chen, Y.-W., Yen, T.-H., Chen, H.-C., Lai, Y.-H., Hou, S.-C., Wu, M.-J., & Chen, H.-H. (2022). The effectiveness of multidisciplinary team huddles in healthcare hospital-based setting.  Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 15(15), 2241–2247.  https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S384554

Nakayama, K., Yonekura, Y., Danya, H., & Hagiwara, K. (2022). Associations between health literacy and information-evaluation and decision-making skills in Japanese adults.  BioMed Central Public Health, 22(1).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13892-5

National Kidney Foundation.  (2024, August 12).  NKF KDOQI clinical practice guidelines.  https://www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi

NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 1 Locating Credible Databases and Research

NIDDK.  (n.d.).  Kidney disease.  National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.  https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/kidney-disease

Rapin, J., Gendron, S., Mabire, & Dubois, C.-A. (2023). Feedback on clinical team performance: How does it work, in what contexts, for whom, and for what changes?  A critical realist qualitative multiple case study.  BioMed Central Health Services Research, 23(1).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09402-x

Wen, J., Wang, W., Kozak, M., Liu, X., & Hou, H. (2020). Many brains are better than one: The importance of interdisciplinary studies on COVID-19 in and beyond tourism.  Tourism Recreation Research, 46(2), 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2020.1761120